🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I usually avoided significant use of luck during my Dungeons & Dragons games. I tended was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be determined by deliberate decisions instead of the roll of a die. However, I opted to try something different, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Seeing an Improvised Tool

An influential actual-play show features a DM who regularly calls for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. This involves choosing a specific dice and assigning consequences contingent on the number. This is essentially no distinct from using a pre-generated chart, these are created spontaneously when a course of events doesn't have a obvious conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own game, primarily because it looked novel and offered a departure from my normal practice. The outcome were eye-opening, prompting me to reconsider the often-debated dynamic between pre-determination and randomization in a roleplaying game.

A Memorable Story Beat

In a recent session, my group had survived a massive battle. When the dust settled, a cleric character inquired after two key NPCs—a sibling duo—had survived. Rather than picking a fate, I handed it over to chance. I told the player to roll a d20. The stakes were: a low roll, both died; a middling roll, only one succumbed; on a 10+, they both lived.

The die came up a 4. This resulted in a incredibly emotional scene where the characters found the corpses of their friends, forever united in their final moments. The cleric performed last rites, which was especially significant due to earlier story developments. As a parting touch, I decided that the forms were strangely transformed, revealing a enchanted item. By chance, the item's contained spell was exactly what the group needed to resolve another major quest obstacle. It's impossible to plan such perfect moments.

Honing DM Agility

This incident caused me to question if chance and thinking on your feet are in fact the beating heart of tabletop RPGs. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles can rust. Groups reliably find joy in upending the best constructed plots. Therefore, a good DM needs to be able to think quickly and invent details on the fly.

Using on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to practice these talents without straying too much outside your usual style. The key is to use them for low-stakes circumstances that have a limited impact on the session's primary direction. For instance, I would avoid using it to decide if the king's advisor is a traitor. But, I would consider using it to figure out if the characters enter a room just in time to see a key action occurs.

Strengthening Player Agency

Spontaneous randomization also works to maintain tension and cultivate the sensation that the game world is responsive, progressing in reaction to their decisions immediately. It reduces the sense that they are merely actors in a pre-written script, thereby strengthening the collaborative aspect of the game.

This philosophy has historically been embedded in the core of D&D. Early editions were enamored with random tables, which made sense for a playstyle focused on exploration. While modern D&D frequently emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, that may not be the only path.

Striking the Right Balance

Absolutely nothing wrong with being prepared. However, it's also fine no problem with relinquishing control and letting the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Control is a big factor in a DM's role. We require it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, at times when doing so can lead to great moments.

The core advice is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Embrace a little chance for inconsequential details. The result could discover that the organic story beat is far more memorable than anything you might have scripted in advance.