🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."