🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's presidential campaign, the former president courted the electorate with pledges to lower costs starting on day one. However, once he assumed office, there was minimal attention to the cost of living. All that changed after inflation-weary voters delivered a rebuke at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, his team launched a slapdash campaign to tackle affordability. Regrettably, this initiative has proven a disorganized endeavor—filled with absurdity, contradictions, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Supermarket Reality

Merely 48 hours post-election, Trump kicked off his cost-reduction push with a disastrous remark: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” This comment from billionaire Trump—often associates with fellow billionaires—revealed a lack of empathy for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go the grocery store. Essentially, he dismissed their struggles as trivial, suggesting they were mistaken about actual costs.

His assertion about declining prices was highly misleading and dishonest. How could every price be decreasing when his cherished tariffs were pushing up costs? Recent data show the cost of bananas rose nearly 7% over the past year, beef prices climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee jumped by nearly 19%—partly due to punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, costs increased in the majority of main grocery groups monitored by the Consumer Price Index, such as meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Economic Claims

Despite these numbers, Trump persists in repeating his big lie about affordability. Since election day, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks contradict the fact that prices overall have clearly increased since Biden left office. Currently, inflation is at a 3% annual rate, that’s half again as much than the central bank’s 2% goal. In another falsehood, he boasted that gas prices had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, despite official data show they average $3.19.

Faced with actual conditions and lower approval ratings, some Trump aides evidently warned that his “prices are down” message made him sound disconnected from ordinary people. A lot of voters are angry about prices continuing to climb after promises of reductions. In response, advisers proposed one quick fix: roll back certain import taxes. The logical move contradicted Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs would not increase costs for US consumers.

Proposed Solutions and Their Possible Impact

With certain taxes being rolled back on several food items, Trump will likely claim that he has lowered costs once these products begin to fall in price. That would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a blaze that he ignited. On another occasion, while speaking fast-food leaders, he declared that “we are in the golden age of America” and told the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to countless households facing hardships—especially when millions risk cuts to nutrition assistance or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a recent poll from October, three-quarters of respondents believe economic conditions are fair or poor, while just a quarter rate them positive. Another poll showed that 61% of Americans feel Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Financial Truth and Proposed Steps

Scott Bessent, the president’s top economic official, recently disputed claims of a golden age. He noted that instead of thriving, some parts of the US economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and lost approximately 33,000 jobs this year. Citing these challenges, Bessent urged the Federal Reserve to reduce borrowing costs—a move that could help affordability.

In response to public dismay about living costs, the president proposed a direct payment of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” not for “the wealthy.” To numerous households in need, this sounds like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that Congress—concerned about huge budget deficits—will approve such a plan. This idea could raise government expenditure, increase interest rates, and possibly fuel inflation by putting more money into consumers’ pockets.

Another proposed solution for affordability centered on introducing 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. But, reality is that 50-year mortgages would do little to lower monthly payments—often reducing them by a small amount each month. The downside is that these loans could significantly increase the total interest borrowers pay and hinder their accumulation of equity.

Faulting the Past Government and Economic Outlook

In their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have once more pointed fingers at the previous president for financial challenges, including increasing costs. Spokespeople claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up Biden’s inflation.” This is absurd and inaccurate allegations. Actually, Biden left a strong economy, with low price growth, solid expansion, and unemployment low. But, the current administration’s actions—particularly his tariffs—have resulted in an difficult situation, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

According to Mark Zandi, chief economist at a research firm, 22 states are already in recession, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. He worries that if key regions like California and New York tumble into recession, the nation could face a widespread recession. In downturns, consumers typically have less money to spend, and inflation often falls. Sadly, given the highly-touted cost initiative likely to do little to control costs, his primary method for improving living standards might prove to be pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that struggling Americans cannot handle.